The assumption that nature is all there

“The assumption that nature is all there is, and that nature has been governed by the same rules at all times and places, makes it possible for natural science to be confident that it can explain such things as how life began.”

— Phillip E. Johnson

Author: Phillip E. Johnson
Category: science
Tags: science, Phillip E. Johnson

 

If modernist naturalism were true, there would

“If modernist naturalism were true, there would be no objective truth outside of science. In that case right and wrong would be a matter of cultural preference, or political power, and the power already available to modernists ideologies would be overwhelming.”

— Phillip E. Johnson

Author: Phillip E. Johnson
Category: science
Tags: science, Phillip E. Johnson

 

Evolutionary naturalism takes the inherent limitations of

“Evolutionary naturalism takes the inherent limitations of science and turns them into a devastating philosophical weapon: because science is our only real way of knowing anything, what science cannot know cannot be real.”

— Phillip E. Johnson

Author: Phillip E. Johnson
Category: science
Tags: science, Phillip E. Johnson

 

The restriction of religion to private life

“The restriction of religion to private life therefore does not necessarily threaten the vital interests of the majority religion, if there is one, and it protects minority religions from tyranny of the majority.”

— Phillip E. Johnson

Author: Phillip E. Johnson
Category: religion
Tags: religion, Phillip E. Johnson

 

In short, it is not that evolutionary

“In short, it is not that evolutionary naturalists have been less brazen than the scientific creationists in holding science hostage, but rather that they have been infinitely more effective in getting away with it.”

— Phillip E. Johnson

Author: Phillip E. Johnson
Category: science
Tags: science, Phillip E. Johnson

 

The problem with allowing God a role

“The problem with allowing God a role in the history of life is not that science would cease, but rather that scientists would have to acknowledge the existence of something important which is outside the boundaries of natural science.”

— Phillip E. Johnson

Author: Phillip E. Johnson
Category: science
Tags: science, Phillip E. Johnson